WEF’s Grand Reset Agenda Continues to Face Significant Backlash from Critics – Bitcoin News

In the midst of the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic, the world’s bureaucrats, financial institutions, multinationals and international organizations began promoting the Great Reset concept, an idea launched by the World Economic Forum (WEF) that claims to foster a greener and fairer world. Since the Great Reset idea began to see much more promotion that year and well into 2020, a large number of global citizens have spoken out against the topic. The controversial topic gained so much prominence that fact-checkers were deployed to social media platforms last year to curb alleged misinformation on the Great Reset theme. Today, various people are still condemning Great Reset content on social media and chastising the establishment that has spread the message.

The now-deleted “You’ll Own Nothing, and You’ll Be Happy” WEF tweet from 2016

If you follow the news and pay attention to economics and politics, you’ve probably heard about the Great Reset and the phrase “You won’t own anything and you’ll be happy.” Many people associate the Great Reset and the term with the World Economic Forum (WEF), an independent international organization founded by Klaus Schwab. That’s because the WEF tweeted about eight predictions for the year 2030 in November 2016.

The tweet and quote “You don’t want to own anything and you want to be happy” originates from one opinion editorial written by Danish Member of Parliament Ida Auken. Then, years later in the midst of the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic, there was a big Great Reset push by the WEF and Schwab published a book called: “Covid-19: The Great Reset.”

The WEF's grand reset agenda continues to backfire
This specific tweet about the eight predictions for the world in 2030 has been deleted.

The idea speaks to a stream of political change, a post-Covid 19 world, equality, climate change and the reimagining of capitalism. The WEF is not the only proponent of the Great Reset idea, as Canada’s 23rd and current Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, has endorsed the idea, and US President Joe Biden has also been accused of supporting the Great Reset concepts via his “Build Back Better” . ” program.

The WEF's grand reset agenda continues to backfire
A tweet WEF made in response to the now-deleted tweet on November 18, 2016, had this screenshot attached. “The blog series this video is based on is a thought experiment to provoke questions about the future. More context in the author’s note at the end of this blog,” WEF wrote years later on October 26, 2020.

A website called greatreset.com promoting the idea has caught people’s attention, and the publication TIME magazine published a collection of Great Reset editorials supporting the theme. In an article published in June 2020, the WEF founder believes that the world must demand that the private sector join the movement.

“It is clear that the will to build a better society exists,” Schwab wrote. “We must use it to ensure the great reset that we so badly need. It will require stronger and more effective governments, even if this does not involve an ideological push for greater. And it will require commitment from the private sector throughout, adds The WEF founder of.

The WEF's grand reset agenda continues to backfire
TIME magazine’s collection of Great Reset editorials.

The “Insane Great Reset” scorned by critics has recently created the International Liberty Forum to push back against the Great Reset

To this day, a large number of people strongly oppose the WEF’s Great Reset idea, and the topic has been common on social media since late 2020. Last year, fact checkers were deployed to social media such as Twitter, and a Reuters Fact Check report claimed: “The World Economic Forum does not have a stated goal that people should own nothing and be happy by 2030.” Despite statements like these and the establishment fact-checkers, many observers believe the Great Reset is a collectivist one agenda.

Actor and political activist Russell Brand discussed the Great Reset in April 2022. Brand’s Great Reset video received 1.8 million views on Facebook, and approximately 859,864 views on Youtube. The reboot agenda topic is still relevant to this day, and is discussed daily on social media. Matt Gubba, managing director of Bizbritain, a financial broker based in Marlow, England, talked on the creation of the International Liberty Forum to combat the Great Reset concepts.

“Our fight back against the WEF is on,” Gubba told his 103,400 Twitter followers on Tuesday. “I would like to introduce you to the International Liberty Forum. Over the coming weeks, we will be working hard to build a platform to push back against the Great Reset and send Klaus packing. This fight CAN be won.”

Canadian conservative Paul Mitchell of the Wildrose Independence Party of Alberta, a provincial political party in Canada, claims that the central bank’s digital currencies are part of the Great Reset plan. “WEF is pushing to end cash and replace it with Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) as part of their insane Great Reset,” Mitchell so, shares a Zerohedge article on a cashless society. “The people of the UK are apparently not cooperating and are using cash more and more. Canadians should do the same, Mitchell added.

Futurist Sikh For Truth told his 54,300 Twitter followers that the Great Reset idea is about mass control. “The World Economic Forum and every government and globalist organization’s goal is to engineer a ‘Great Reset’ – the result will be a UN-based world government founded on climate hysteria with social and digital mass control,” Sikh For Truth so on Wednesday. While many people have called the Great Reset a fascist plan aimed at installing a totalitarian global order of elitists, most of today’s media is calling it a right-wing, anti-vaxxer conspiracy theory.

Great reset metrics via Google Trends Get a significant amount of worldwide interest compared to the most asked topics

By searching using the terms “Great reset” and “WEF” on Twitter and other social media sites, the search results will invariably lead to posts or threads that denigrate the big reboot ideas of climate change, crony capitalism and political globalism. Interest in the Great Reset is staggering as data from Google Trends (GT) shows that during the second week of January 2022, the search for “Great Reset” received a GT score of 95 out of 100.

At the end of February 2022, for three weeks, the search’s GT score remained at 99-100, and while the term dropped to 35 in May, the Great Reset topic is on the rise again, and the term’s GT score is in its 50th week. GT data started to fine-tune the Great Reset search in May 2020, when it had a score of less than 1 that month. The subject’s search rankings also reached 100 in November 2020, in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Tags in this story

collectivism, communism, conspiracy theory, COVID-19, Covid-19: The Great Reset, economy, Economy, Fascism, Economy, Financial Reset, Financial Reset, Great Reset, Great Reset topic, International Liberty Forum, Klaus Schwab, Matt Gubba, Paul Mitchell, propaganda, reimagining capitalism, Sikh For Truth, social infrastructure, socialism, stakeholder economics, time magazine, WEF, WEF Davos, World Economic Forum

What do you think of the Great Reset and the people who have voiced their opinions against the idea? Let us know what you think about this topic in the comments section below.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is the news editor at Bitcoin.com News and a financial technology journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open source and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 5,700 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.




Image credit: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or an endorsement or recommendation of products, services or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *