Study identifies top 10 states in America most interested in Bitcoin, Ethereum – Bitcoin News

On September 2, online crypto market aggregation portal Coingecko.com published a study identifying the top ten states in America most interested in the two leading digital currencies, bitcoin and ethereum. The team leveraged Coingecko’s site traffic data and found that California captures 43% of the traffic visiting the site’s bitcoin and ethereum web pages.

California and Illinois Lead the Pack, New Jersey and Indiana ranked lowest

Between May 2 and August 21, 2022, Coingecko’s researchers conducted a study that aims to determine the top 10 and 20 states in America most interested in the two leading cryptocurrencies, bitcoin and ethereum.

Coingecko used the website’s web traffic data and indexed the data set to 100, with 100 being the highest point for website traffic results. The crypto market aggregation site is popular as it has a global rank on similarweb.com of 1,743 and in the US it is 3,150.

The study identifies the top 10 states in America most interested in Bitcoin, Ethereum

In the last month coinecko.com registered 44.4 million visits according to statistics on September 3rd. Coingecko’s study indicates that California dominated all the states in America and Illinois had the second highest index score.

The study identifies the top 10 states in America most interested in Bitcoin, Ethereum

Illinois residents visited the bitcoin website much more, while ethereum’s website was visited much less. Most of the top 20 states had a higher score for bitcoin, but states like New Jersey, Wisconsin, Colorado, and Florida had a higher ranking for ethereum.

New Jersey and Indiana had the lowest ratings (1.5) of the top 20. Of the top 20 states, Coingecko’s study shows that bitcoin dominates in interest with 76% while ethereum has 24%.

After the second most interested state, New York, Florida, Washington, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, Georgia and Arizona followed in popularity. Coingecko’s COO and co-founder Bobby Ong explained that he was not surprised that California was the most dominant state in the US in terms of interest in bitcoin and ethereum.

“It is not surprising that California, as one of the world’s major technology hubs, takes the crown in ‘blue-chip’ cryptocurrency interest rates,” Ong said in a statement on Friday. “Of particular note is Colorado, Wisconsin, New Jersey and Florida’s interest in Ethereum over Bitcoin. It remains to be seen how these rankings and market shares will play out in the coming months, with Ethereum’s Merge around the corner.”

Tags in this story

Arizona, Bitcoin, Bitcoin (BTC), bitcoin’s website, Bobby Ong, california, CoinGecko, Coingecko Co-founder, Coingecko study, Coingecko traffic, colorado, crypto assets, Crypto interest, Ethereum, Ethereum (ETH), ethereum’s website, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Interests, Interest crypto, Markets, New Jersey, new york, Pennsylvania, ranks, Scores, study, Texas, traffic scores, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin

What do you think of Coingecko’s study showing that California dominates website traffic? What do you think of the other stats and the state’s score? Let us know what you think about this topic in the comments section below.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is the news editor at Bitcoin.com News and a financial technology journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open source and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 5,700 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.




Image credit: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or an endorsement or recommendation of products, services or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *