Screw Web3 – my decentralized web has no blockchain

Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee wants to save his creation from centralization. But does he abide by Web3’s promise of salvation?

At the TNW conference, the computer scientist gave an answer in one word:

“No.”

Regards, humanoids

Subscribe to our newsletter now for a weekly summary of our favorite AI stories in your inbox.

That guy may seem to clash with Berners-Lee’s recent actions. The 67-year-old is now campaigning to save his “dysfunctional” brain child from Big Tech’s clutches.

He has also earned $ 5.4 million by selling an NFT – one of Web3’s supposed pillars.

But the British have their own vision for the Internet’s successor: a decentralized architecture that gives users control over their data.

Berners-Lee wants to build it on a platform he calls Solid – but you can call it the Web 3.0.

“We talked about it as Web 3.0 at one point, because Web 2.0 was a term used for malfunction in what happens to user-generated content on the major platforms,” ​​he said.

“People have called it Web 2.0, so if you want to call it Web 3.0, fine and good.”

On the blockchain, it just does not work.

Berners-Lee shares Web3’s alleged mission to transfer data from Big Tech to the people. But he takes a different path to the goal.

While Web3 is based on blockchain, Solid is built with standard network tools and open specifications.

Private information is stored in decentralized data warehouses called “pods”, which can be hosted where the user wants. They can then choose which apps can access their data.

This approach aims to provide interoperability, speed, scalability and privacy.

“When you try to build those things on the blockchain, it just does not work,” Berners-Lee said.

In 2018, Berners-Lee (center) and John Bruce (right) founded the open source startup Inrupt to commercialize Solid.