All investment/financial opinions expressed by NFTevening.com are not recommendations.
This article is educational material.
As always, do your own research before making any kind of investment.
Canceled Sotheby’s NFT auction highlights the need for diversity and representation
Sotheby’s, the famous auction house, canceled its “Natively Digital: Glitch-ism” NFT auction on Sunday. The decision came after one of the featured artists, Patrick Amadon, announced his withdrawal from the event. Amadon, an art specialist, criticized the auction for not representing female identifying artists. Significantly, he argued that Sotheby’s should have been more inclusive in its Glitch-ism collection. Let’s take a closer look!
Patrick Amadon emphasizes the importance of representation and inclusion in the art industry
First, let’s take a look at Sotheby’s NFT auction. 21 artists showcased their NFTs in Sotheby’s “Glitch-ism” online auction, which launched on Friday. Also, the collection consisted of various media, including JPEGs, MP4s, and GIFs that reflect computer errors. But now the sale is on hold.
“STATIC GLITCH 2013” was the piece sold at Sotheby’s NFT auction. The artwork received 21 bids, with the final bid at $8,500. However, this was before the auction was cancelled.
Sotheby’s “Oddly Satisfying” auction preceded the canceled auction. It showcased 58 NFT pieces and artworks from renowned artists such as ARC and Lucas Zanotto. Furthermore, it was recently held as part of the “Natively Digital” series.
Patrick Amadon, a glitch art artist, withdrew his artwork from Sotheby’s “Glitch-ism” NFT auction. Amadon made this decision due to the lack of female representation. Amadon pointedly stated that representation is essential in the industry.
“While I believe it was a genuine oversight and the team means well, the lack of representation is a serious issue and we need to address this in our room,” he wrote on his Twitter account. “Female identifying artists have played a huge role in the glitch movement.”
Canceling Sotheby’s NFT auctions prompts inclusivity conversation
Let’s take a closer look at Patrick Amadon’s call for change. Patrick Amadon clearly highlighted the importance of representation and inclusion, demonstrating that his decision aimed to have a wider impact. He did not limit the decision to Sotheby’s “Glitch-ism” NFT auction. Rather, he intended to shape how artists will be displayed in the future.
“It’s critical that we build this movement right,” he said. “Everything we do now not only affects our community today, it will affect thousands upon thousands of future artists who inherit what we have left them.”
Liz, another glitch artist, wrote on Twitter: “Patrick Amadon proves that one person can make change happen at a time when he could really leverage his success to make money. Instead, he uses his newfound fame to publicly protest the lack of representation in the arts. Great example.”
Amadon’s decision to withdraw his works from the “Glitch-ism” NFT auction, which affected the future exhibition of artists, has highlighted the critical importance of inclusion and representation in the art world. The auction’s cancellation underscores the need for increased diversity, which extends beyond Sotheby’s “Glitch-ism” collection.
